T.Com. Paris, 11 Dec. 2020, n°2020035120
Under the terms of an order issued on December 11, 2020, the President of the Paris Commercial Court, ruling in summary proceedings, ordered the lessee to pay the lessor the rents due to him according to the breakdown as of November 30, 2020.
The lessee, who claimed to be a victim of the administrative closures of non-essential businesses, had stopped paying his rents, charges and accessories since April 2020.
To oppose the request for payment made by the lessor, the lessee successively invoked:
- a breach by the lessor of its obligation to deliver due to a case of force majeure,
- the temporary disappearance of the thing rented;
- the need to revise the lease due to the contingency theory
To condemn the lessee, the president of the Paris commercial court held that:
- the Covid-19 cannot be qualified as unforeseeable and therefore be assimilated to a case of force majeure;
- the loss of the rented thing is also ineffective, if access to the rented place has been temporarily prohibited to the public, the tenant could still access it physically;
- The request for revision of the rent on the basis of unforeseeability cannot be accepted since the amount of the contractually agreed rent remained the same during the events and therefore did not become “excessively onerous”.
- The lessee fails to demonstrate his good faith.
A manifestly illicit disturbance having been noted, the president of the court considered that it was appropriate to put an end to it and to condemn, on a provisional basis, the lessee to pay his rental arrears.
Fanny Hurreau
author
associate lawyer
Repetition of old-age benefits obtained by fraud
Court of Cassation, Plenary Assembly, May 17...
Biennial prescription: the Court of Cassation finally sets limits in favor of insurers
The obligation to inform insurers about the causes of interruption of the two-year prescription does not require mentioning the entire article 2243 of the Civil Code according to which the interruption does not take place when the claimant give up, leave...
Interview with Romain Picard, young partner of the firm Arst Avocats specialized in Corporate / M&A
Today we welcome Romain Picard, a young partner from Arst Avocats, who tells us about the reasons that led him to join the firm and talks to us about the projects that drive him with regard to the development of the practice of Corporate / M&A in this office...
Repetition of old-age benefits obtained by fraud
Court of Cassation, Plenary Assembly, May 17...
Biennial prescription: the Court of Cassation finally sets limits in favor of insurers
The obligation to inform insurers about the causes of interruption of the two-year prescription does not require mentioning the entire article 2243 of the Civil Code according to which the interruption does not take place when the claimant give up, leave...
Interview with Romain Picard, young partner of the firm Arst Avocats specialized in Corporate / M&A
Today we welcome Romain Picard, a young partner from Arst Avocats, who tells us about the reasons that led him to join the firm and talks to us about the projects that drive him with regard to the development of the practice of Corporate / M&A in this office...